Monday, February 20, 2017

Donald Trump 1-0-1



   I don't understand why everyone seems to be so 'Anti-Trump'?
He was democratically elected in a two hundred year old flawed system, and became the President of the United States.
The mainstream media has you believe he may not have gotten the 'popular vote', but he got the most votes WHERE IT MATTERED.


Hillary claimed that the Russians hacked the election, so that Donald Trump would win.  I hear her argument.  I've been hearing it since November 9th.  The one small thing that this argument/accusation is missing however, is proof.  Not even one small bit of evidence.  Not even a slight clue has ever been made public.  It's all been, "...because I/we say so". 

The question that no one is asking is: How can the most 'secure' nation in the world, get hacked to such an extent, over the span of entire day, and no one notice?
Assuming the Russians DID hack the entire American General Election, then there should be no question that the next election held in the United States will be held with PAPER BALLOTS.  Who wants to bet that won't happen?

Yes, Fake News is Fake News.  But why is it still being spouted?  Do the Powers
That Be really think we're that stupid?  It does however appear that many people are.  Otherwise the Trump Supporters wouldn't be called 'loony' for supporting him, or conspiracy theorists. 
Hillary Clinton didn't lose the General Election because the Russians hacked it.  She didn't lose because she's a woman.  She lost for two other reasons:

 1)
She's a Clinton.

 2)
Trump hasn't lied his entire life to the entire American public.


It Looks Like Donald Trump Was Right After All
President Donald Trump was the subject of mockery on Sunday after delivering a speech in Florida in which he referred to an incident “last night in Sweden” — but he appears to have been referring to an actual, accurate news report, albeit one that wasn’t technically live or breaking.

As soon as the words flew from Trump’s mouth, social media began buzzing with jokes about his “fake news” story about a migrant attack in the historic Scandinavian country.

....  But Trump may not have been wrong – at least, in terms of subject matter. Friday night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson interviewed documentarian Ami Horowitz about his upcoming film about violence involving migrants in Sweden. Horowitz claims that the Swedish government is downplaying an uptick in violence that followed a wave of refugee migration into the country.
************************************************************************************
UPDATED FEBRUARY 21ST, 2017

Dramatic footage shows cars ablaze in Swedish riot (VIDEOS) 

************************************************************************************

 

 It is my opinion that when Trump says something he has good reason. I have found it takes the media about 2 weeks to catch up, and then it all makes sense.

Those are just two very brief examples of how the Mainstream Media is getting lies out about Donald Trump....  And most of the sheeple are buying what they're selling.
George Soros
I ask that you open your minds.  Just assume for a moment that your media is lying to you.  Assume that almost everything you've been told in life is a lie.  Then you'll understand why we (the tin foil hat wearing community) do what we do.  We're not the crazy ones.  We just don't like being lied to.  The others out there, (the normal community) just has had their eyes opened yet.  Once that happens, REAL change will come about.

Knowledge in power.  ARM YOURSELF!




Sunday, February 5, 2017

Trumps Seven Countries




Why were are there hundreds of thousand of people marching against Trump when his predecessor President Barack Obama was destroying the seven countries named in President Trump's Immigration Executive Order?

IRAQ -



video

Sure enough the Liberal Mainstream Media didn't call it 'war', now did they?  Nor, was there any Obama bombing on Syria, that could precipitate refugees, presumably.


SYRIA - 



video

Yes no massive demonstrations against the EVIL White House, when Obama was arming Saudi Arabia to do that in Yemen.


YEMEN - 


video

On to 'TRUMP VISA BAN COUNTRY #4'.


SUDAN - 


video


It was in fact bombed by the US-backed Israeli Army during Obama's tenure in The White House.
 Country Five on the Trump List.

SOMALIA - 


video


  Self Defense.  Yes.  President Obama was terrified of arguably the world's POOREST country.

When it comes to Iran being on Trump's list, could this be because of The USA's decades long covert war continued under Obama.  Together with punitive sanctions that Iranian authorities blame for Cancer drug shortages and plane crashes.  Albeit that US National Security Advisor, General Flynn, has put Iran now 'on notice'.

The seventh country that Donald Trump is weary of when it comes to 'Anti-American sentiment'.

LIBYA - 


video



That war, of course was supported by British Prime Minister Theresa May.  And the Mainstream Media now ranged against Trump.
Is it not a little obvious that Donald Trump is all too aware that the people of these seven countries, destabilized by the Obama regime, have populations angered by US Foreign Policy?


Knowledge is Power.  ARM YOURSELF!!


Friday, January 27, 2017

Watching major media commit suicide



  This is a post from fellow blogger Jon Rappoport.  I read it, and was quite moved. 
I thought I'd take this opportunity to share it with you, in it's entirety.





Watching major media commit suicide

Watching major media commit suicide
Notes on the end of the news business as we know it
It’s personal
by Jon Rappoport
January 21, 2017
By Jon Rappoport
This article goes to many places. I think you’ll find a place that works for you.

I’ve been investigating and reporting on deep medical fraud for 29 years. I’ve been around the block a few hundred times. I’ve spoken with scientists who work for the government and universities, and the media operatives who support them. I know the game.
If Robert F Kennedy Jr is, indeed, given the green light by President Trump to investigate vaccine safety, he’s going to need a truck and a chain and DOJ threats of prosecution to drag key CDC scientists into the light and elicit specific statements from them.

Even then, the odds are these scientists will keep repeating the party line: vaccines are overwhelmingly safe; they have no connection to autism or other neurological damage; the science is settled.
Kennedy could run up against an organized wall of silence—scientists refusing to speak with him, on the basis that he isn’t qualified to make judgements in their “field.”

In that case, he will need subpoena power, for starters.
Many years ago, I interviewed Jim Warner, a White House policy analyst in the Reagan administration. He had been trying to obtain medical-research information from the federal National Institutes of Health. He told me he was given the absolute cold shoulder: “If ever I’ve been tempted to believe in socialism, science has disabused me of that. These guys [at NIH] assume that it’s their show. They just assume it.”

Arrogance par excellence. Scientists rebuff the White House with a yawn.

Fortunately, Kennedy is a relentless investigator. He understands how science is corrupted and paid for. And the ace in the deck is this: there is already enough evidence in the open record to refute the CDC’s claim of vaccine safety.

Trump has blazed a trail of rejecting major media. As a result of his merciless attacks, press outlets are going mad pushing numerous outlandish fake stories. They’re ripe for further incursions on their territory.

In the past, this was the pattern: an outsider enters the scene and accuses the government of vast fraud; media operators assemble their usual cast of sordid characters, who dismiss the charges; everybody goes home and the story dies.

But that’s not working anymore. Media pomposity is exposed as fakery. Millions of people see through the ruse.
The media emperor is naked. He can prance around and around, but his fundamental nakedness keeps compounding the joke.
Truth be told, as their financial positions sink into dire red ink, press operations are trapped. Why?
Because they are partners with the high-level criminals whose activities are the very stories the public wants to know about.
Reporting on these crimes in great depth, day after day, would resuscitate the newspapers and broadcast networks. But that will never happen.

For example, these crimes:

* The Federal Reserve/a clandestine private corporation.
* Medically caused death.
* Toxic vaccines.
* Trillions of dollars of missing US government money.
* The power of the Trilateral Commission over US government policy.
* The covert implementation of the UN agenda of destruction in US communities.
And a hundred more issues.
Expose these down to the core, and people would buy newspapers off the rack like they buy coffee and beer and video games and cell phones and gasoline and underwear and toilet paper and lipstick and fast food. The Times would have to schedule extra press runs just to keep up with the demand. Its financial bottom line would soon look like Christmas.

You could talk to the publisher of the New York Times and present him with an ironclad plan for pulling his paper out of its deep financial hole, based on covering true stories like those above, and you would find no joy, because he would rather go down with the ship than go up against The Matrix.

The Times and other hoary media outlets live by the rule of limited hangout. In intelligence parlance, that means admitting a small piece of the truth in order to hide the rest.
“We’ll show you a tree in the forest, but not the forest.”
I know how it works, because as a reporter I’ve been there. I’ve approached editors of various media outlets with stories that crack the trance, and I’ve had those stories tossed back at me.
“We’re just not interested,” they say. “This isn’t our kind of piece.” Or: “Well, we already covered that.” But they didn’t cover it. They did a limited hangout on it. They ran a story that exposed one tiny corner of a whole bloody mess.

I say this—as simple fact—if any intelligent, aggressive, truly independent investigator were the managing editor of the New York Times, and if he were given free rein, he would have that paper back in the black in a year. He would have it roaring on all cylinders. He would have people fighting each other in the streets to grab the last copy off the newsstand. Journalism schools all over the country would close down in shame. Because he would be running stories that would crack the whole rotting edifice of cartel-control along many fronts, and he would be filling up a planned vacuum of truth with fire.

A decade ago, here is what a working reporter for a major paper told me: “We know what stories we can’t cover. Nobody needs to prep us. Our editors know, too. Otherwise, they’d never get to be editors.”

A player in a non-profit group once told me I could have a job with a paper on the east coast. In a roundabout way, he hinted at what they were looking for. In five minutes, I saw the handwriting on the wall. Essentially, the editor was searching for a reporter who would cover politics in Central America. The stories would have to favor the repressive governments in power. The basic cover was: these leaders were fighting the good fight against Communism. The death squads they were sending out, in cooperation with the CIA, were freedom fighters. And of course, any mention of cocaine trafficking as a means for obtaining weapons was off-limits.

None of this was spelled out. But the message was clear. They wanted a propaganda specialist. If I, as an up and coming reporter, decided to play ball, I could advance up the ladder.
Apparently, some travel was necessary. But I knew I could turn out reams of copy without ever leaving my apartment, because I grasped the fundamental angle I was supposed to pursue. Needless to say, I turned down the offer.

It was the first time I fully realized how easy the job of reporting could be. Assemble a list of reliable sources (who would support the mandatory point of view), walk right into a prepared group of corporate and think-tank allies, pull down copy from wire services, and re-write stories in a way that bolstered the idea that American Empire was really “spreading democracy” to the less fortunate. A walk in the park.

Twenty years later, I saw the same overall pattern in hundreds of major-media stories—but the point of view and the mandate had changed. Now it was all about Globalism. The covert op was the takedown of America, in order to squash the last vestige of political freedom and integrate the nation in “a new economic order.”

However, over the mountains, a new dawn was rising: the Internet. Independent media outlets. The resistance.
It was immediately obvious that, unless someone could shut this new creature down, major media would have no way to challenge the invasion. Independent news sources would gradually wreck MSM financial bottom lines.

Fronting for Globalist princes, Big News would see their bias exposed time and time again. The blowback on them would be enormous.
Trapped and corned like rats, they would attack, but their efforts would only compound their problem.

Then a populist named Donald Trump strolled on to the scene. He knew major media were suffering great losses. He knew online media were in the ascendance. He had people like Steve Bannon (Breitbart) who were bringing him up to speed. He saw how Matt Drudge was obliterating traditional news sources, even while (selectively) linking to them. A revolution was in progress.

Trump had the right stuff for this situation, because he didn’t care about offending people. He was mercurial, reckless; an opportunist. He could fly by the seat of his pants. He realized where and how, in America, the Globalists were causing great damage.
Trump accelerated the fall of major media from their thrones.

People around the world, untold millions, thought to themselves, “Trump is finally giving major media what they deserve.”
Giving the major media what they deserve is a force to be reckoned with, because there is no effective response to it. Nothing works. Who can lead the fight to preserve mainstream news? Answer: mainstream news. That isn’t going to go anywhere, because more and more people are rejecting the mainstream wholesale.

Think of major media as a ship. In full view of the passengers, the captain has just steered it into a shore of high rocks. The craft is beginning to tilt, and it’s taking on water. As the passengers scramble to safety on the beach, the captain is yelling, “Don’t leave, come back, everything is all right, I didn’t do anything wrong, it’s your fault, you’re too stupid to understand the correct principles of navigation!”

Translation: “I’m committing suicide. Go down with me.”

As a reporter starting out in the 1980s, one of my first glimpses of trouble involved a few of the papers I was writing for: they were definitely on the political Left, but at the same time they were businesses. You only had to look at the ads choking the pages to see that. They were capitalist enterprises. But they would never fully admit that. They were operating under a self-induced, self-serving delusion about fundamental economics. Eventually, larger publishers bought them out, and a few of the old guard made significant dollars on the deals. It was an old story about socialists getting rich.

This contradiction plagues every major media outlet today. They claim to serve the public interest, but they want to be rich. Their reporters want very nice salaries. And this is all in the service of Globalism, which aims to bankrupt economies and drive populations into the arms of technocrat planners of societies. It doesn’t add up. It doesn’t work.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to be rich and working hard to achieve it. But claiming, at the same time, that you want the government to run the economy is a sick joke. A transparently sick joke, on the order of wealthy celebrities stumping for socialism, while they hire more armed security and dig bunkers on their walled properties.

Suppose you could approach a well-known and well-paid reporter for the New York Times. And suppose you said this: “For years, you’ve been writing about the less fortunate and giving back and more government support for the downtrodden and humanitarianism and so on—so I want to know, would you be willing to donate two-thirds of your salary, for the sake of equality, to those who need the money? Would you be willing to sell your co-op and give the money to the poor and move into a small apartment?”

The duplicitous and slimy major media are obviously engaged in a long con. They want their cake, they want to eat it, and they also want to appear as architects of “a more humane planet.”
They care about a more humane order in the same way an ant cares about space travel.

They care about serving their bosses, and those bosses have other bosses who are engineering a future of poverty for all, as a mechanism of control. That’s who’s paying reporters their salaries.

Do you know what a tired rich media liberal (fake socialist) looks like? Of course you do. You can see one every night anchoring the national news. Over the years, I’ve spoken with a few of these types. In every case, I’ve gotten the impression they’re sitting on a keg of dynamite.

They know how precarious their position is. They’re surprised they’ve lasted as long as they have. Their spouting of liberal homilies is transparent. Where did they go wrong? Answer: the first day they accepted their first job as a reporter. That’s when they sold out. They knew it then, and under cheesy layers of vast pretensions, they still know it now. But they can’t turn around. They’ve made a commitment.

They tell themselves: “It’s business. It’s not personal. This is the business I’m in.”

But of course, it is personal. Everything is personal. We’re talking about lives and minds and souls.
That’s what these reporters traded, in the perverse corner of the marketplace. They chose the rackets, the information mafia, the law of omerta, the dishonorable underground that lives in the highest penthouses.
Whatever gloss they lay on, the trap they’re in stays in place.
And now, they’re sinking and sinking.

I could try to work up pity for them, buy why bother?
Damage is damage, and they’ve done a great deal of it.

A full confession would make a start, but that’s not going to happen.
They’re in a race with themselves. How long can they keep erecting delusions about their work, vs. their growing realization about those delusions?
It’s inescapably personal.
It always was.

The night is falling on them, and the rain is coming down, too. Their mandate is to be on the Inside, but they’re on the Outside now.
They’re the walking dead. They’ll keep walking, but things will never be the same.

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Social Experiment


It has come to my attention that many people all around the Clear, and indeed the Dark Web suffer from endless ads on how to make money with BitCoin, LiteCoin, and countless other CryptoCurrency. 
Let me tell you, that's all bunk.  At the time of writing this blog, BitCoin is valued at 1btc = $883.95 USD.  True, the value of a BitCoin fluctuates quite a bit.  It's been as low as $0.05 USD and as high as $1500.00 USD.


Bitcoin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency and a payment system[14]:3 invented by an unidentified programmer, or group of programmers, under the name of Satoshi Nakamoto.[15] Bitcoin was introduced on 31 October 2008 to a cryptography mailing list,[16] and released as open-source software in 2009.[17] There have been various claims and speculation concerning the identity of Nakamoto, none of which are confirmed.[15] The system is peer-to-peer and transactions take place between users directly, without an intermediary.[14]:4 These transactions are verified by network nodes and recorded in a public distributed ledger called the blockchain,[18] which uses bitcoin as its unit of account. Since the system works without a central repository or single administrator, the U.S. Treasury categorizes bitcoin as a decentralized virtual currency.[11] Bitcoin is often called the first cryptocurrency,[19][20][21] although prior systems existed[note 4] and it is more correctly described as the first decentralized digital currency.[14][25] Bitcoin is the largest of its kind in terms of total market value.[26]
Bitcoins are created as a reward in a competition in which users offer their computing power to verify and record bitcoin transactions into the blockchain. This activity is referred to as mining and successful miners are rewarded with transaction fees and newly created bitcoins.[14]:5–7 Besides being obtained by mining, bitcoins can be exchanged for other currencies,[27] products, and services.[28] When sending bitcoins, users can pay an optional transaction fee to the miners.[29] This may expedite the transaction being confirmed.
In February 2015, the number of merchants accepting bitcoin for products and services passed 100,000.[30] Instead of 2–3% typically imposed by credit card processors, merchants accepting bitcoins often pay fees in the range from 0% to less than 2%.[31] Despite the fourfold increase in the number of merchants accepting bitcoin in 2014, the cryptocurrency did not have much momentum in retail transactions.[32] The European Banking Authority[33] and other sources[14]:11 have warned that bitcoin users are not protected by refund rights or chargebacks.
The use of bitcoin by criminals has attracted the attention of financial regulators,[34] legislative bodies,[35] law enforcement,[36] and media.[37] Criminal activities are primarily focused on darknet markets and theft, though officials in countries such as the United States also recognize that bitcoin can provide legitimate financial services.[35]
 It's only a matter of time until BitCoin is traded on all the major Stock Markets, and accepted as a legitimate currency.

There are many vendors around the world that already accept Bitcoin as an option to pay.  Many of those vendors are storefronts.  Brick and Mortar stores.  Not just online, although that's where the vast majority of them are, currently. 





Value forecasts

Financial journalists and analysts, economists, and investors have attempted to predict the possible future value of bitcoin. In April 2013, economist John Quiggin stated, "bitcoins will attain their true value of zero sooner or later, but it is impossible to say when".[182] A similar forecast was made in November 2014 by economist Kevin Dowd.[195]
In December 2013, finance professor Mark T. Williams forecast that bitcoin would trade for less than $10 by mid-year 2014.[196] In the indicated period bitcoin has exchanged as low as $344 (April 2014) and during July 2014 the bitcoin low was $609.[45][197] In December 2014, Williams said, "The probability of success is low, but if it does hit, the reward will be very large."[198]
In November 2014, David Yermack, Professor of Finance at New York University Stern School of Business, forecast that in November 2015 bitcoin may be all but worthless.[199] In the indicated period bitcoin has exchanged as low as $176.50 (January 2015) and during November 2015 the bitcoin low was $309.90.[45]
In May 2013, Bank of America FX and Rate Strategist David Woo forecast a maximum fair value per bitcoin of $1,300.[200] Bitcoin investor Cameron Winklevoss stated in December 2013 that the "small bull case scenario for bitcoin is... 40,000 USD a coin".[201]

Now, my experiment is thus:  Below you will find a QR link to my BitCoin Wallet, and an HTML link to it, as well.  If everyone who reads this blog, and is currently a BitCoin Miner, or a Bitcoin user, I ask you to transfer a small amount to my wallet.  I currently use a small BitCoin ASIC miner, and would A: like to upgrade it, and B: would like to use the extra BitCoin to invest in this blog.  To be able to do more research, and be able to spend more time working on blog posting.  Make sense?

Thanks you for reading, thank you for sharing whatever BitCoin you can, and thank you very much for sharing this blog on your favorite Social Media sites.



Thursday, December 22, 2016

Just In Time For Christmas - IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS!!



That´s what I call old school, 9/11 style terror fear spreading...

After they had to admit that they have the wrong person arrested, after they had to admit that the real perpetrator is still on the run, armed and dangerous, now suddenly "our protectors" found IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS in that truck. And I thought these times were over, because the passport stories got too old. I thought we were at "last wills on the home pc of the terrorist", left "IS" flags and "credible" stuff like that.
You live and learn...

It's good that nobody has the idea now that "our protectors" needed a success, as fast as possible, by hook or by crook. But really, now suddenly they find IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS. Why do they use the oldest and most
unbelievable story of all "terror evidence" stories, right when they need a success? Why didn´t the forensics team find it when they searched the truck for hours at the spot where everything happened??? Because the driver cab of that truck was bigger than the biggest truck cabin ever?


Why should a terrorist run around with any papers, if they aren't faked? And why the hell do they seem to lose them every time at the spots were they did their attack? Too much of a coincidence, if one asks me...


"Funny" thing now is, the whole MSM is going postal:
"They know who it is", "They found identification documents of the Muslim Kleve", say his name again(I don´t do that any more) plus that they show the picture, coincidentally a not nice looking person, sure with beard and long hair, of the alleged terrorist... While "our protectors" allegedly are preparing a raid in Kleve to arrest that terrorist. Because they have no TV in Kleve... So it is not possible that all that warns the alleged perpetrator?


Really, in the beginning of all that I thought it was possible that it really was a religious nut. But now, after the "protectors" suddenly found identification documents...
Come on Big Brother, I am pretty sure you can do that better!


But I guess the rulers don´t care anymore if something is credible, logically, believable. It seems they have to hurry up with building their defence line, the censoring Big Brother Police State. Because they maybe know that the next revolution of the people is imminent, and this will not be a peaceful revolution, I am afraid. And the rulers are too!
It´s them that are feared (of the revenge of the people, of losing power), so they have to play the most evil games of them all.


It´s not simple people that light the world on every corner. And put oil into these fires, after that! It´s not simple people that have to work in secrecy, hidden from the public, "only for the best of the people, their security"...


Now the Germans (and by extension, the world) get fooled live again, from the "warriors against all evil on earth"!
 At most against the self created, self funded and supported till today Muslim terrorists, that are a wonderful bogeyman to let Big Brother grow, while evil Superputin is used for the rest.



Oh Big Brother, I here you coming with big, huge steps...

Knowledge is Power:  ARM YOURSELF!! 

Saturday, December 17, 2016

Why Do We Fall For FAKE NEWS??


I recently read an article about how the news (albeit 100% fake) is pushed down the throats not only of Americans, but most English speaking people.  How we're fed lie after lie about things that are happening on the other side of the planet, and unless the average citizen does some hardcore fact-checking, has no reason to dispute what is printed.


NYT Fake News on Aleppo

Written by Subject: Syria NYT Fake News on Aleppo

by Stephen Lendman

Daily NYT editions read like bad fiction, showing contemptible disregard for truth-telling, entirely absent where it's most needed - fake news substituting.

Coverage of America's presidential campaign turned The Times into a laughing stock, featuring advocacy instead of unbiased reporting. 

The so-called newspaper of record is a national disgrace, notably when America goes to war or plans one, supporting imperial aggression instead of denouncing it.

Its Syrian war coverage is abominable - all fake news all the time, including the just concluded battle for Aleppo. On December 13, it headlined "Assad's Lesson From Aleppo: Force Works, With Few Consequences," saying:

"For months, the bodies have been piling up in eastern Aleppo as the buildings have come down, pulverized by Syrian and Russian jets, burying residents who could not flee in avalanches of bricks and mortar."

Fact: "Russian and Syrian jets" suspended bombing eastern Aleppo in mid-October. No "bodies have been piling up" in streets, ICRC representatives on the ground confirming it.

The Times: "Cold, hungry and scarred by the deaths of loved ones, tens of thousands of civilians and fighters are awaiting buses to take them from their homes to uncertain futures."

Fact: Evacuation of all eastern Aleppo residents was completed on Friday. They're safe for the first time in four-and-a-half years - given hot food and medical care as needed, grateful to Syrian forces for freeing them from captivity, held under brutalizing conditions as human shields by US-supported terrorists.

The Times: "This is the Middle East that President-elect Donald J. Trump will face upon taking office next year, a region where jihadists have erased borders, Russia is ascendant, Iran has extended its reach through powerful militias and American allies are questioning how much they can rely on Washington."

Fact: America created and supports "jihadists" in Syria and elsewhere. Russia, Iran and Hezbollah intervened responsibly to combat them, at Assad's request. 

Wherever "Washington" shows up, mass slaughter, destruction and unspeakable human misery follow. It remains to be seen if Trump intends another way, or whether he'll continue imperial madness.

The Times: "The siege and bombardment of Aleppo…came after years of conflict in which Mr. Assad's forces attacked protesters, dropped exploding barrels on rebellious communities and used chemical weapons on their own people."

Fact: What rubbish! Liberating Aleppo involved a carefully planned military operation, waged against the scourge of US-supported terrorists - monsters responsible for gruesome atrocities, including cold-blooded murder, torture and use of chemical weapons.

Syria destroyed its CW stockpile under supervision of Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons ' representatives. No evidence links its forces with their use. Claims otherwise are fake news.

The Times: "The Syrian conflict did not begin as a civil war but as a popular uprising aimed at ousting Mr. Assad. He responded to protests with gunfire, detentions and torture. Many in the opposition took up arms to defend themselves and fight back…"

Fact: Syria is Obama's war, orchestrated by Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, naked aggression against a sovereign independent country threatening no one.

A so-called "popular uprising" was staged, orchestrated in Washington, a pretext to launch naked aggression. No civil war exists, imported death squads used as imperial foot soldiers.

The Times is an instrument of state-sponsored propaganda - featuring fake news instead of the real thing. Abandon it or stay misinformed. The goes for all media scoundrels.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 

His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Also reading other 'uncompromised' News outlets (Not North American Mainstream Media), this was learned:

On December 16, the Russian military announced that eastern Aleppo had been fully liberated from militants and terrorists. However, according to Moscow, Syrian government forces are still fighting “isolated pockets of militant resistance.”

Nearly 3,500 militants from eastern Aleppo have surrendered to the Syrian government, while thousands have seized the chance to leave through special corridors with light weapons. The evacuation was partly halted on Friday after militants tried to leave the city with heavy weapons, which is not permitted under the agreement allowing them to exit eastern Aleppo.
Konashenkov (Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov),
On December 16, the Russian military announced that eastern Aleppo had been fully liberated from militants and terrorists. However, according to Moscow, Syrian government forces are still fighting “isolated pockets of militant resistance.”

  .
Konashenkov noted that the liberation of Aleppo had effectively opened a new “window of opportunity” to introduce a cessation of hostilities, “not only in the Aleppo province,” but also in other regions of Syria, while stressing that “a desire to negotiate with all parties to the conflict directly ‘on the ground,’ except for terrorist groups,” is key to speeding up the peace process in the war-ravaged state.
Attempts to replace this “hard work” with conferences in “cozy Western capitals,” talking to “high representative committees,” or sending in some monitoring group is “useless and a dead end,” he said.
“The sooner it is realized in Paris, London, and Washington, which are so far not even capable of sending humanitarian aid to Syria, the sooner there will be peace,” Konashenkov concluded.
noted that the liberation of Aleppo had effectively opened a new “window of opportunity” to introduce a cessation of hostilities, “not only in the Aleppo province,” but also in other regions of Syria, while stressing that “a desire to negotiate with all parties to the conflict directly ‘on the ground,’ except for terrorist groups,” is key to speeding up the peace process in the war-ravaged state.
Attempts to replace this “hard work” with conferences in “cozy Western capitals,” talking to “high representative committees,” or sending in some monitoring group is “useless and a dead end,” he said.
“The sooner it is realized in Paris, London, and Washington, which are so far not even capable of sending humanitarian aid to Syria, the sooner there will be peace,” Konashenkov concluded.
I'll bet you won't hear that on the 6 o'clock news tonight.




Knowledge is power.  ARM YOURSELF!!



Thursday, December 15, 2016

FAKE NEWS: U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack



Trusty ol' NBC has yet dumped another load of FAKE NEWS on America:  That there is now PROOF that Russia was behind the DNC hacks.  Just watch:



The obvious trouble with this story is:  Who leaked it to the press, and what's the damning evidence?  Just telling us that there is 'evidence', shouldn't be enough for anyone to accept.  Where is the
smoking gun?  Why is God's name would Vlad Putin get personally involved?  Don't you think he has more important things to do....?  Maybe running the largest country in the world?







A little bit of light reading posted just today, January 15, 2016 by a much more reputable source:
DNC docs were leaked, not hacked, intelligence veterans say

Pass this around to your friends.... I'd love to hear their opinions.

Knowledge is power: ARM YOURSELF!!~